www.tarotpack.com
Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 61
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
I was eager to read the OP's entry yesterday, because I recently met Cindy and became a big fan right away. I was somewhat taken aback by his choices of words. I also read the responses of the many posters who frequent this sub-forum. I was impressed by the restraint shown by them.
I met Cindy only recently. Our very first date was off-the-chart, with all the activities listed by the OP in the header of his review. Our first date immediately went into my list of the top five sexual experiences I've had in almost 20 years of hobbying. She made a very positive impression on me with her fun, engaging personality. And she brings it.
But I diverge. Back to the topic of the OP's choices of words. The thing I was most surprised by was that it was one of the crudest posts, if not the crudest post, I've read on massageplanet or on the legacy board in all these years. I joined massageplanet within its first couple of months, I believe.
I've seen other posters' posts get edited or deleted by mods for less. Does the OP's post now define the present lower-end of acceptability on this board ??
Cindy is sweet, friendly, beautiful, "authentic", and has the skills. She's very good to all of us. She deserves to be treated well and certainly deserves better than the OP's post.
And, if she's 46, she has the best body I've ever seen on a 46-year-old woman, in either the hobby or the real world.
TG
I met Cindy only recently. Our very first date was off-the-chart, with all the activities listed by the OP in the header of his review. Our first date immediately went into my list of the top five sexual experiences I've had in almost 20 years of hobbying. She made a very positive impression on me with her fun, engaging personality. And she brings it.
But I diverge. Back to the topic of the OP's choices of words. The thing I was most surprised by was that it was one of the crudest posts, if not the crudest post, I've read on massageplanet or on the legacy board in all these years. I joined massageplanet within its first couple of months, I believe.
I've seen other posters' posts get edited or deleted by mods for less. Does the OP's post now define the present lower-end of acceptability on this board ??
Cindy is sweet, friendly, beautiful, "authentic", and has the skills. She's very good to all of us. She deserves to be treated well and certainly deserves better than the OP's post.
And, if she's 46, she has the best body I've ever seen on a 46-year-old woman, in either the hobby or the real world.
TG